TallyIDAHOLegislative Tracker

Idaho Bills

790 bills · 2025 Regular Session

S1182senate

Amends, repeals, and adds to existing law to establish the Uniform Guardianship, Conservatorship, and Other Protective Arrangements Act.

This bill is the result of five years of intense study by legal experts, community groups, and others of the existing Idaho Conservatorship/Guardianship Probate Code. This bill adds more protections for those involved in the process on multiple levels. It provides clarity in areas where questions have arisen in the current Code. It provides multiple detailed alternatives to formal Conservatorship/Guardianship court proceedings, including Protective Arrangements and Supported Decision Making. It retains multiple Idaho procedures that are working well. It requires detailed information at the beginning of a process under the Code. It protects the constitutional rights of persons subject to the Code or those affected by proceedings under the Code, including through more stringent notice provisions, required written statements of rights both at service of the petition and before hearings. It sets higher standards of evidence (usually ‟clear and convincing”). It also moves the Conservatorship/Guardianship provisions for persons with a developmental disability into the Probate Code. This gives the additional protections in the Probate Code while retaining all the existing protections in the developmental disability code. The bill also organizes the Code into a more logical set of Chapters. It also contains model forms and model statements of rights.

James Ruchti · SD-029

Introduced
H0164house

Amends and adds to existing law to establish the Idaho Education Opportunity Program.

This legislation creates the Idaho Education Opportunity Program (IEOP) to provide families with school age students, Kindergarten to 12th Grade, a choice to utilize up to 80% of the average per student state funding. EligibleSpecialEducationStudentswouldqualifyfor100%. ThefundingforanIEOPaccountcouldbeusedfor eligible expenses, including Tuition at an accredited private school. or a Personalized Student Education Plan thatwouldincludeexpendituresforTextbooks,reasonabletransportation,educationequipmentandtechnology, educational therapies, fees for testing, admissions, fees to manage the IEOP account, tuition for individual classes, uniforms, tutoring, and technology devices. Eligible Students from families with less than $75,000 of Adjusted Gross Income, entering the program as a kindergarten student, or applying after having attended an Idaho Public School for 90 days in the prior school year, will have priority of appropriated funds. Students in families with an AGI’s greater than $75,000, can be eligible at reduced participation rates. The public school district or charter school of record shall receive the balance of the average distribution (20%) of the average distribution calculation. The Parents agree that IEOP funds shall only be used according to the approved uses andagreethatanyQualifiedSchoolshallprovidetheparentswiththeresultsofanationallynormedassessment. Use of funds for a Personalized Student Education Plan will include a nationally normed assessment. To renew theaccounttheparentshalldemonstratethattheirstudentisatgradelevelorhasshownonefullyearofacademic growth. The bill also establishes a deduction of paid tuition and fees from a families taxable income, excluding any tuition and fees paid with IEOP funds. The effective date of this bill is January 1, 2026, and the first applications will be received by June 15, 2026, for the 2027 school year. The IEOP would likely provide 3,100 students to have the funds to choose an alternative to the Public Scho

Lance Clow · HD-025A

Introduced
H0124house

Amends existing law to revise a provision regarding the salaries of judges.

Judicial Salaries are established by the Legislature in section 59-502, Idaho Code, which also indexes such salaries to a Supreme Court Justice’s salary to avoid salary compression between the four types of judgeships. JudicialsalariesinIdahohavesimplynotkeptpacewithmarketchanges. Insix(6)ofthelastsixteen(16)years no increase to judicial salaries has been provided via amendment to § 59-502. At the same time, salaries for experienced attorneys have increased. The resulting lag of judicial compensation behind the market salaries for other experienced attorney positions creates serious hurdles to recruiting and retaining experienced, qualified attorneys to serve as Idaho’s judges. Five (5) years ago District Judge openings resulted in an average of eleven (11) applicants per position. By this past fiscal year, that number had plummeted to 4.6 candidates per opening, and several recent District Judge openings only received applications from the bare minimum of three (3) candidates. Judges are also leaving the bench to return to other work. While no judges left the bench to returntootherworkinfiscalyear2023, three(3)judgesdidinfiscalyear2024, andfour(4)judgeshavedoneso thus far in fiscal year 2025. Adequate judicial compensation is routinely cited as a primary reason experienced Idaho attorneys do not pursue or continue a judicial career. This bill seeks to establish judicial salaries that are more competitive with the compensation for other public and private sector experienced attorney positions in Idaho and the judicial compensation rates paid by the states surrounding Idaho. Specifically, this bill will set the annual salary of a Magistrate Judge at $193,000, a District Judge at $201,000, a Court of Appeals Judge at $207,000, and a justice of the Supreme Court at $215,000.

Bruce Skaug · HD-010B

Introduced
S1021senateSigned

Amends existing law to revise provisions regarding conditions under which termination may be granted.

I.C. 16-2005(5) allows for simultaneous adoption with termination of parental rights (TPR) in certain specified circumstances. Prior to 2020, this process was also used for non-simultaneous adoption of children in DHW's custody, untiltheIdahoSupremeCourtdecidedinMatterofDoeI,166Idaho759(2020)thatnon-simultaneous adoption was not allowed for children in DHW's custody because it is not expressly stated in the statute. The result of this decision is children remain in DHW's custody longer with the state covering the costs of the child's care when there is person willing to adopt and parents would consent to the termination. This bill gets children to permanency faster and restores the status quo ante by allowing simultaneous adoption for the adoption of children in DHW's legal custody as occurred prior to 2020.

Enacted

340

← Prev167832Next →